DJI Phantom 3

Elon Musk Free Tesla

Embark on a Quest with Elon Musk Free Tesla

Step into a world where the focus is keenly set on Elon Musk Free Tesla. Within the confines of this article, a tapestry of references to Elon Musk Free Tesla awaits your exploration. If your pursuit involves unraveling the depths of Elon Musk Free Tesla, you've arrived at the perfect destination.

Our narrative unfolds with a wealth of insights surrounding Elon Musk Free Tesla. This is not just a standard article; it's a curated journey into the facets and intricacies of Elon Musk Free Tesla. Whether you're thirsting for comprehensive knowledge or just a glimpse into the universe of Elon Musk Free Tesla, this promises to be an enriching experience.

The spotlight is firmly on Elon Musk Free Tesla, and as you navigate through the text on these digital pages, you'll discover an extensive array of information centered around Elon Musk Free Tesla. This is more than mere information; it's an invitation to immerse yourself in the enthralling world of Elon Musk Free Tesla.

So, if you're eager to satisfy your curiosity about Elon Musk Free Tesla, your journey commences here. Let's embark together on a captivating odyssey through the myriad dimensions of Elon Musk Free Tesla.

Showing posts sorted by date for query Elon Musk Free Tesla. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query Elon Musk Free Tesla. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Twitter Shareholders To Vote In September On Musk Deal: What You Need To Know


Twitter shareholders to vote in german twitter shareholders to vote in japanese what happens to twitter shareholders today what happens to twitter shareholders top twitter shareholders current twitter shareholders list of twitter shareholders
Twitter Shareholders to Vote in September on Musk Deal: What You Need to Know


Twitter Shareholders to Vote in September on Musk Deal: What You Need to Know

Twitter shareholders are expected to vote in September on billionaire Elon Musk's $44 billion proposal to buy the influential social network after he tried to back out of the deal.

Twitter scheduled a meeting for shareholders to vote on the proposal on Sept. 13 at 10 a.m. PT, according to a regulatory filing on Tuesday. The company's board of directors is urging shareholders to approve the deal.

"We are committed to closing the merger on the price and terms agreed upon with Mr. Musk. Your vote at the special meeting is critical to our ability to complete the merger," the filing stated. Under the deal, shareholders will receive $54.20 in cash for every share of Twitter's stock they own. 

Twitter and Musk are currently embroiled in a legal battle because the billionaire said in July he no longer wanted to buy Twitter and take the company private. Musk's attempt to back out of acquiring the social media site has raised concerns about Twitter's future. 

Musk has said the deal can't move forward until he gets proof that fewer than 5% of Twitter's 229 million daily users in the first quarter were fake or spam-focused, an important metric for understanding Twitter's ads business. But Twitter alleges in a lawsuit against Musk that the billionaire is trying to pull out of the deal because his personal wealth has fallen so the acquisition has become more expensive for him. 

Here's what you need to know about the ongoing saga between Musk and Twitter:

Why is Musk trying to end the deal?

Musk, who leads Tesla and Space X, appears to have concerns about the future of Twitter's business, even though he said at a TED2022 conference that he didn't care about the "economics" of buying Twitter.

A letter sent by Musk's lawyer claims Twitter violated parts of its agreement with Musk, and it outlines information the company allegedly failed to provide the billionaire, including about the social network's calculations of daily users. Twitter makes most of its money from ad sales, so the number of people who can see ads is an important metric for the company.

"This information is fundamental to Twitter's business and financial performance and is necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement because it is needed to ensure Twitter's satisfaction of the conditions to closing, to facilitate Mr. Musk's financing and financial planning for the transaction, and to engage in transition planning for the business," the letter said.

Since Musk reached an agreement with Twitter, the company's stock price has fallen and there are fears about a potential recession. Twitter has fired key executives, frozen hiring and laid off about 30% of its talent acquisition team. 

Twitter isn't buying Musk's explanation and alleges in the lawsuit his information requests were designed to "designed to try to tank the deal."

Why did Musk want to buy Twitter in the first place?

Musk is an avid user of the service but also one of its loudest critics.

Musk tweeted a poll to his followers in March that asked whether users believed Twitter was protecting free speech. He said the poll results, in which roughly 70% of 2 million respondents answered "no," would be "very important." 

"Given that Twitter serves as the de facto public town square, failing to adhere to free speech principles fundamentally undermines democracy. What should be done?" Musk said in a follow-up tweet. Then he made an offer to buy Twitter, noting that he believed Twitter needed to be private to accomplish his goal.

The guarantee of free speech in the US Constitution's First Amendment applies to the government censoring speech but not to companies such as Twitter, which have their own rules about what isn't allowed on their sites.

Musk referenced free speech again when Twitter announced the deal in April. He also said he wanted to enhance Twitter with new features and promised he would make the service's algorithms open source, defeat spam bots and authenticate all humans.

"Twitter has tremendous potential," Musk wrote. "I look forward to working with the company and the community of users to unlock it."

Progressives have criticized social media companies for failing to crack down on harmful content such as hate speech and harassment. Conservatives claim their speech is being censored. (Twitter has long denied allegations it censors conservatives.) 

On April 19, Musk tweeted that he thinks social media policies "are good if the most extreme 10% on left and right are equally unhappy." He's also said he would reverse the ban on former US President Donald Trump who was booted from the platform after the Jan. 6 Capitol Hill riots because of concerns about inciting violence. Trump has said he doesn't plan to return to Twitter even if the company lifts the ban.

What has Twitter's response been?

Twitter says closing the deal is in the best interest of shareholders.

Initially, it seemed like Twitter was going to turn down the offer but the board started to take it more seriously when Musk offered details about how he would finance the deal. The company had adopted a defensive strategy known as the "poison pill" that would make it tougher for Musk to add to his stake in the company. The tactic allowed Twitter to accept a competing offer, if one emerged.

Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey tweeted on April 15 that "as a public company, twitter has always been 'for sale.' that's the real issue." Twitter has dealt with leadership changes, layoffs and activist investors as a public company. After Twitter announced the deal, Dorsey said he didn't believe that anyone should own or run Twitter but taking it back from Wall Street is the "correct first step."

"Solving for the problem of it being a company however, Elon is the singular solution I trust," Dorsey tweeted. "I trust his mission to extend the light of consciousness."

A filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission also shed more light on how the deal came together. Musk spoke to Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey in March about the future of social media and decentralizing social media so users get more control over their data and what content they see.

Musk's effort to acquire Twitter has been a bumpy one. Musk rejected a seat on Twitter's board before offering to take the company private. Musk also had a conversation with Dorsey in early April in which Dorsey said he thought Twitter, a publicly traded company, would be better off as a private company, the filing shows.

How did Musk plan to pay for Twitter?

Even for Musk, who's worth about $220 billion, buying Twitter requires some financial juggling.

In an initial SEC filing on April 20, Musk said he had personally committed about $21 billion in equity financing. He also secured about $25.5 billion in debt financing through Morgan Stanley and other financial institutions. 

Since then, Musk has raised capital by selling $8.5 billion in Tesla shares, presumably for the deal, and lined up $7.1 billion from outside investors. According to a May 4 filing, those investors include Sequoia Capital and Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison. (Ellison sits on Tesla's board of directors.) Saudi Arabian investor Prince Alwaleed bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz Alsaud also agreed to pledge his stake of roughly 35 million shares to the deal.

On May 24, Musk pledged more equity to the deal. He's now willing to put $33.5 billion toward the acquisition.

What happens next?

Twitter shareholders are scheduled vote on the deal at a special meeting in September. Meanwhile, Twitter is asking the Delaware Court of Chancery to enforce its agreement with Musk. A trial is expected to happen over five days in October. Killing the deal could cost Musk $1 billion because of a termination fee that's part of the agreement, according to an SEC filing on April 25.


Source

https://sumpahh.omdo.my.id/

.

Elon Musk Makes Tesla Superchargers Free For People Fleeing Ukraine


Elon Musk Makes Tesla Superchargers Free for People Fleeing Ukraine


Elon Musk Makes Tesla Superchargers Free for People Fleeing Ukraine

Tesla owners fleeing Ukraine can use its Superchargers for free in four cities in bordering Poland, Hungary and Slovakia, according to a report from Electrek, which cited an email to local owners. This comes after Russian forces invaded Ukraine last week.

Both Tesla and non-Tesla electric vehicles can use the chargers at no cost in Trzebownisko, Poland; Košice, Slovakia; Miskolc, Hungary; and Debrecen, Hungary, the email reportedly said.

There are about 30,000 electric vehicles are on Ukraine's roads, the Kyiv Independent reported in January, compared to millions of non-EV cars in the country.

Around 660,000 refugees have fled Ukraine following the Russian military's invasion, the United Nations Refugee Agency estimated Tuesday.

Tesla no longer operates a public relations department to field requests for comment.

Read more: Russia Invades Ukraine: Latest Updates as Biden Bans Russian Planes From US Airspace


Source

Tags:

Tesla Now Wants You To Pay Extra For A Level 1 Charger With Its Vehicles


Tesla Now Wants You to Pay Extra for a Level 1 Charger With Its Vehicles


Tesla Now Wants You to Pay Extra for a Level 1 Charger With Its Vehicles

Historically speaking, when someone has bought an electric vehicle, it's come with a 110-volt mobile charger. It makes sense, right? You might need to charge in an emergency, or maybe you don't have a Level 2 charger at home. Well, like our old friend Bob said, "The times they are a-changin'," because Tesla is no longer including a 110-volt charger with its new vehicles.

This news was reported Saturday by InsideEVs and confirmed by Tesla CEO Elon Musk in a Tweet. His stated reasoning for getting rid of the included 110-volt charger is that people don't use them. That makes sense when you think about just how long it takes to charge any EV on 110 volts. Our long-term Mini Cooper SE takes multiple days to go from around 10% charge to 100%, and its battery is tiny compared with a Tesla's.

Of course, taking away something that people have gotten used to getting for free is a sure way to get people riled up on social media. In response, Musk tweeted that Tesla would offer the Level 1 charging kit for $200 and make it easy to order along with the car. As of publication, it's not part of the Model 3 or Model Y configurators, though.

Interestingly, Tesla isn't the only company bailing on the venerable old 110-volt wall charger. Kia's EV6, for example, also doesn't include one, but people don't seem as angry about that. That could be down to it being a new model, or -- and this seems more likely -- Kia fans just aren't as rabid as Tesla fans.

Typically, we'd contact a car company for more information in situations like these, but Tesla does not operate a public relations department to field requests for comment.


Source

Tags:

What Is Signal? Everything You Need To Know About Elon Musk's App Recommendation


What is signal everything you need to know about elon musk spacex what is signal everything you need to know about elon musk snl what is signal everything you need to know about elon musk siblings what is signal detection theory what is signal messenger what is signal words what is signal phrase
What is Signal? Everything you need to know about Elon Musk's app recommendation


What is Signal? Everything you need to know about Elon Musk's app recommendation

Tech mogul Elon Musk -- known as widely for slinging cars into the sun's orbit as he is for advocating against COVID-19 safety measures -- took to Twitter earlier this month to slam Facebook over its latest privacy policy updates for its supposedly secure encrypted messaging app WhatsApp. Musk instead recommended people choose encrypted messaging app Signal. 

The tweet was then retweeted by Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey. Shortly after, Signal tweeted that it was working to handle the surge of new users. 

The Signal app was downloaded almost 1.3 million times on Jan. 11, according to data from Apptopia, a tracking firm. The app had been downloaded an average of 50,000 times a day prior to Musk's tweet. A Signal spokesperson said the report undercounted the number of downloads the service is experiencing.

Signal also attributed a temporary outage later that week to the surge in new users. 

"While we have been working hard all week to keep up with all the new people switching over to Signal, today exceeded even our most optimistic projections. We are working hard to resolve [the issue]," the spokesman told CNET in an email. 

Musk's Twitter endorsement also incidentally led shares in the biotechnology company Signal Advance to soar, despite the fact that it is completely unrelated to Signal, which is not a publicly traded company. 

This isn't the first time Musk has publicly sparred with Facebook over privacy concerns. In 2018, he not only had his own personal Facebook page removed, but those of his companies Tesla and SpaceX. His take on the long-fought battle between Signal and WhatsApp isn't off-base, though. 

Both of the encrypted messaging apps have been found to have security bugs over the years that have been resolved. For years, WhatsApp has openly collected certain user data to share with parent company Facebook. Its latest policy change just expands that. Signal, on the other hand, has a history of fighting any entity that asks for your data, and adds features to further anonymize you where possible. 

Read more: Signal vs. WhatsApp vs. Telegram: What to know before you switch messaging apps

Soon after Musk's tweet, WhatsApp published an FAQ aimed at clarifying its data collection policy, emphasizing that neither it nor Facebook can see users' private messages or hear their calls. Following mounting privacy concerns, WhatsApp announced Friday it would delay the rollout of its new policy by three months.

"We're now moving back the date on which people will be asked to review and accept the terms. No one will have their account suspended or deleted on February 8. We're also going to do a lot more to clear up the misinformation around how privacy and security works on WhatsApp. We'll then go to people gradually to review the policy at their own pace before new business options are available on May 15," the company said in a blog post. 

Here are the basics of Signal you should know if you're interested in using the secure messaging app. Plus, here are all of the differences between Signal, WhatsApp and Telegram.

Signal is a typical one-tap install app that can be found in your normal marketplaces like Google'sPlay Store and Apple'sApp Store, and works just like the usual text messaging app. It's an open source development provided free of charge by the non-profit Signal Foundation, and has been famously used for years by high-profile privacy icons like Edward Snowden.

Signal's main function is that it can send text, video, audio and picture messages protected by end-to-end encryption, after verifying your phone number and letting you independently verify other Signal users' identity. You can also use it to make voice and video calls, either one-to-one or with a group. For a deeper dive into the potential pitfalls and limitations of encrypted messaging apps, CNET's Laura Hautala's explainer is a life-saver. But for our purposes, the key to Signal is encryption.

Despite the buzz around the term, end-to-end encryption is simple: Unlike normal SMS messaging apps, it garbles up your messages before sending them, and only ungarbles them for the verified recipient. This prevents law enforcement, your mobile carrier and other snooping entities from being able to read the contents of your messages even when they intercept them (which happens more often than you might think). 

When it comes to privacy it's hard to beat Signal's offer. It doesn't store your user data. And beyond its encryption prowess, it gives you extended, onscreen privacy options, including app-specific locks, blank notification pop-ups, face-blurring anti-surveillance tools, and disappearing messages. Occasional bugs have proven that the tech is far from bulletproof, of course, but the overall arc of Signal's reputation and results have kept it at the top of every privacy-savvy person's list of identity protection tools. 

For years, the core privacy challenge for Signal lay not in its technology but in its wider adoption. Sending an encrypted Signal message is great, but if your recipient isn't using Signal, then your privacy may be nil. Think of it like the herd immunity created by vaccines, but for your messaging privacy. 

Now that Musk and Dorsey's endorsements have sent a surge of users to get a privacy booster shot, however, that challenge may be a thing of the past.


Source

Twitter Sues Elon Musk To Complete $44B Purchase


Twitter sues elon musk to complete 44b bras twitter sues elon musk to complete 44b19r twitter sues elon musk to complete synonym twitter sues elon musk to complete a video twitter sues elon musk to complete meaning twitter sues elon musk to completely overhaul twitter sues elon musk torso twitter sues elon musk total worth twitter sues elon musk to elizabeth twitter sues musk twitter sues elon twitter sues paxton
Twitter Sues Elon Musk to Complete $44B Purchase


Twitter Sues Elon Musk to Complete $44B Purchase

What's happening

Twitter sued billionaire Elon Musk after he told the company he no longer planned to buy the social network for $44 billion.

Why it matters

The lawsuit sets the stage for a legal battle between Twitter and the world's richest man. Musk's attempt to back out of the deal has raised concerns about the social network's future.

What's next

Musk's lawyers are expected to respond to Twitter's lawsuit.

The legal showdown between billionaire Elon Musk and Twitter has officially begun.

On Tuesday, Twitter sued Musk to complete his $44 billion purchase of the social media platform, a move that sets up what will likely be a messy and lengthy court battle. The stakes are high for Twitter as the company deals with fallout from what has been a chaotic relationship with the world's richest man. 

In a 62-page lawsuit filed in Delaware's Court of Chancery, Twitter pushed back against several arguments Musk's legal team made when the billionaire told Twitter he no longer planned to buy the company. Twitter accused Musk of breaching the agreement and called his exit strategy a "model of hypocrisy."

The lawsuit notes that Musk's stake in his company Tesla declined by more than $100 billion from its peak in November 2021 and that's the reason why the billionaire wants to back out of the deal.

"Musk apparently believes that he — unlike every other party subject to Delaware contract law — is free to change his mind, trash the company, disrupt its operations, destroy stockholder value, and walk away," the complaint stated. 

Last week, Musk informed Twitter in a letter that he was ending the agreement to buy the social media company. At the time, Twitter said it planned to take legal action to enforce the agreement. Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, argued that Twitter breached the agreement by not disclosing details about how it estimates the number of spam accounts on the platform. Twitter estimated in the first quarter that fewer than 5% of Twitter's 229 million daily users were fake or spam-focused but Musk thinks the number is much higher. The billionaire said getting that information was an important part of understanding Twitter's business, which makes most of its money from ads.

Twitter said in the lawsuit that Musk was well aware that there were caveats to the data and the agreement said that the information he requested must be for a "reasonable business purpose" related to completing the deal. Musk made "unreasonable" requests but Twitter still tried to work with him to get him more information. His requests for more data, Twitter alleges in the lawsuit, were "designed to try to tank the deal." The company also had concerns about how Musk, who has suggested building a competitor to Twitter, would use their data if he was able to successfully end the deal. Twitter notes that Musk's ability to end the agreement is very limited but he "wanted an escape." 

The New York Times, which reported the lawsuit earlier, said that Twitter told employees in a memo the company is seeking a four-day trial in September. In a motion filed on Tuesday, Twitter asks the Delaware court to speed up the process to protect its shareholders and the company from the potential harm that comes from Musk's efforts to "bully his way" out of the deal. Twitter's stock dropped 11% on Monday to $32.65 per share days after Musk announced he didn't want to purchase the company. 

Under the merger agreement, Twitter and Musk have until Oct. 24 to complete the deal. Shareholders would still need to approve the deal in a special meeting.

In its lawsuit, Twitter also alleges that Musk violated the agreement by making public comments Twitter didn't consent to and posting disparaging tweets. In May, Musk tweeted a "misrepresentation" of how many accounts Twitter samples to estimate the number of spam accounts on its platform, according to the lawsuit. Musk also tweeted that Twitter's legal team complained to him about violating a nondisclosure agreement. When Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal tweeted more details about how the company battles spam accounts, Musk replied with a poop emoji.

The lawsuit cites other tweets Musk shared over the weekend after telling Twitter he wanted to back out of the deal. One tweet included a meme with actor Chuck Norris in front of a chess board.

"For Musk, it would seem, Twitter, the interests of its stockholders, the transaction Musk agreed to, and the court process to enforce it all constitute an elaborate joke," the lawsuit said.

Twitter rebutted other arguments Musk is trying to make to end the deal. Musk alleges Twitter violated a part of the agreement that said the company had to seek and obtain consent before straying from "its obligation to conduct its business in the ordinary course," after the social network fired key executives, laid off staff and froze hiring. But Twitter said in the lawsuit that the company did negotiate a right to hire and fire employees at all levels without having to seek Musk's consent. The company, though, did try to be cautious and sought Musk's consent for several key decisions, including about two employee retention programs but he was "non-committal."

The lawsuit also reveals that Twitter was suspicious that Musk was abandoning efforts to finance the deal. When the social network tried to get more information about how Musk was going to pay for the company, the billionaire sent a text to Agrawal and Twitter Chief Financial Officer Ned Segal.

"Your lawyers are using these conversations to cause trouble," Musk said in a text that Twitter cited in the lawsuit. "That needs to stop."

The lawsuit was widely expected. Over the weekend, Twitter called Musk's termination of the deal both "invalid and wrongful." 

Bret Taylor, the chair of the social network's board, announced the filing in a tweet, saying the company aimed to hold Musk "accountable to his contractual obligations." 

Dan Ives, an analyst at Wedbush Securities, said the wrangling between Musk and Twitter had produced "no winners."

"This has been a black eye for Musk and horror movie for Twitter (and its employees) with no winners since the soap opera began in April," he said in a note. Potential outcomes include a settlement, a breakup fee and the deal being enforced. The agreement between Musk and Twitter included a $1 billion termination fee.

Musk's lawyer Mike Ringler didn't respond to a request for comment. 

After Twitter filed the lawsuit, Musk tweeted, "Oh the irony lol."


Source

Tesla Revives Enhanced Autopilot For $6,000


Tesla enhanced autopilot upgrade later is tesla enhanced autopilot worth it tesla model s enhanced autopilot tesla enhanced autopilot review what is tesla enhanced autopilot will tesla offer enhanced autopilot tesla enhanced autopilot upgrade later tesla reviews tesla reviews 2022 tesla reviews consumer reports tesla reviews nz
Tesla Revives Enhanced Autopilot for $6,000


Tesla Revives Enhanced Autopilot for $6,000

This story is part of Plugged In, CNET's hub for all things EV and the future of electrified mobility. From vehicle reviews to helpful hints and the latest industry news, we've got you covered.

What's happening

Tesla is once again offering the Enhanced Autopilot package, now priced at $6,000.

Why it matters

Enhanced Autopilot delivers a number of driver-assistance upgrades that were formerly limited to the $12,000 "Full Self-Driving" option. This could mean big savings for buyers who only want some of these features.

Two weeks ago, a person on Twitter asked Tesla CEO Elon Musk to bring back the Enhanced Autopilot package as a sort of middle ground between standard Autopilot and the "Full Self-Driving" package. Musk responded with "OK," and now, it's back.

Don't forget that, despite the name of Tesla's feature, there are no self-driving cars on sale today.

Tesla this week reintroduced the Enhanced Autopilot package for its electric cars. This optional upgrade, which will cost $6,000, builds upon the standard Autopilot driver-assistance suite by adding automatic lane changes, automatic parking assist and automated vehicle retrieval (also known as Summon and Smart Summon). It also includes Navigate on Autopilot, which combines various driver assists to help control the vehicle from on-ramp to off-ramp.

Tesla has reshuffled its driver aids a number of times. Enhanced Autopilot used to function as the precursor to the "Full Self-Driving" option, which picked up most of its features when the mid-level offering was eventually dropped, with the rest going to basic Autopilot. The "Full Self-Driving" option remains, and it's still $12,000, but its complement of features has been dramatically reduced. Now, on Tesla's site, it says the package offers "traffic light and stop sign control" in addition to what Enhanced Autopilot offers, and in the future, it hopes to add automated steering on city streets.

Now, let's throw out a couple disclaimers here. Like Autopilot, Enhanced Autopilot is a system that requires the driver to give their full attention to the road during its operation. Handsfree does not mean brain-free. Even "Full Self-Driving," which is still in beta, requires owners to be cognizant of their surroundings at all times in case the driver needs to retake control at a moment's notice. No car currently offered for sale can be referred to as self-driving. 

Tesla does not operate a public relations team and thus could not be reached for comment.

Tesla's suite of driver-assistance features has put the company in the spotlight recently, and not in the most ideal ways. In early June, NHTSA asked Tesla to respond to a series of questions regarding reports of phantom braking on Autopilot-equipped vehicles, where the cars may engage the brakes apropos of nothing. One week later, NHTSA expanded its probe into crashes where Autopilot was involved to cover some 830,000 vehicles. 


Source

Search This Blog

Menu Halaman Statis

close